Ohio's Don't Say Gay Bill Is Now Law And Professor Jerry Coyne FAFO

Secular Left

MP3•Αρχική οθόνη επεισοδίου

33:58

In this episode, we delve into the concept of being "qualified" in the workplace, examining who gets labeled as such, who doesn't, and the underlying reasons. We explore "competency checking"—the practice of scrutinizing individuals' abilities—and how it disproportionately affects underrepresented groups, often going unnoticed or unchallenged. Our discussion aims to redefine qualifications in a fair, equitable, and actionable manner. Our guest, Shari Dunn , is an accomplished journalist, former attorney, news anchor, CEO, university professor, and sought-after speaker. She has been recognized as Executive of the Year and a Woman of Influence, with her work appearing in Fortune Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, Ad Age, and more. Her new book, Qualified: How Competency Checking and Race Collide at Work , unpacks what it truly means to be deserving and capable—and why systemic barriers, not personal deficits, are often the real problem. Her insights challenge the narratives that hold so many of us back and offer practical solutions for building a more equitable future. Together, we can build workplaces and communities that don’t just reflect the world we live in, but the one we want to create. A world where being qualified is about recognizing the talent and potential that’s been overlooked for far too long. It’s not just about getting a seat at the table—it’s about building an entirely new table, one designed with space for all of us. Connect with Our Guest Shari Dunn Website& Book - Qualified: https://thesharidunn.com LI: https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/sharidunn TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thesharidunn Related Podcast Episodes: How To Build Emotionally Mature Leaders with Dr. Christie Smith | 272 Holding It Together: Women As America's Safety Net with Jessica Calarco | 215 How To Defy Expectations with Dr. Sunita Sah | 271 Share the Love: If you found this episode insightful, please share it with a friend, tag us on social media, and leave a review on your favorite podcast platform! 🔗 Subscribe & Review: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music…

πριν περίπου ένα χρόνο 44:18

Ohio’s recent legislative developments have sparked significant controversy. The state’s governor signed a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law, which not only limits discussions on LGBTQ+ topics in schools but also permits a Christian Nationalist group to remove children to bible study in the middle of the school day. Meanwhile, a federal judge ruled that using preferred pronouns constitutes a violation of the First Amendment, deepening the national debate on LGBTQ+ rights. Professor Jerry Coyne has come under fire for his use of biological arguments to justify discrimination, while in a positive turn, a Trans woman has been appointed to a city council, offering a glimmer of hope amid these challenges. These events reflect the growing cultural and legal tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues, free speech, and the role of religion in public education.
We start with the contentious signing of a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law by Ohio’s governor, which has drawn sharp criticism for not only silencing conversations around sexual orientation in schools, especially for younger students, but also for enabling a Christian Nationalist group to indoctrinate public school children during school hours. The bill, now formalized under House Bill 8, imposes significant restrictions on discussing sexuality and mandates that educators inform parents of any changes in a student’s wellness services, particularly concerning their gender identity. The legislation aims to erase LGBTQ+ visibility while perpetuating a culture of fear and secrecy among students questioning their identities.
A federal judge's recent decision, which declared that requiring teachers to use transgender students' preferred pronouns violates First Amendment rights, characterized such requirements as coercive. We emphasizes the chilling effect this ruling has on educators and students alike, reinforcing stigma and hostility against transgender individuals. We also critique the rationale used by the judge, criticizing the failure to recognize the basic dignity and rights of individuals as a cornerstone of this democracy.
In a more hopeful turn, we celebrate a victory for representation as Arienne Childry, a trans woman, was appointed to the city council for St. Mary’s, Ohio. This appointment marks a significant milestone as it reflects the progress being made at local levels despite the oppressive legislative environment. We underscore the importance of having representatives who genuinely embody the values of inclusion and secular humanism within governmental structures, marking Childry's presence as a beacon of hope in a state riddled with anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment.
Full Show Notes & Links Used

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our Merch
Follow us on Bluesky
Find us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on Instagram
Find us on Counter Social
Find us on Mastadon

Κεφάλαια

1. Ohio's Don't Say Gay Bill Is Now Law And Professor Jerry Coyne FAFO (00:00:00)

2. Don't Say Gay in Ohio (00:01:00)

3. 1st Amendment Shouldn't Hurt People (00:17:37)

4. Jerry Coyne FAFO (00:28:13)

5. Trans Woman Appointed to City Council (00:37:09)

98 επεισόδια

#Politics #Religion #News Talk #News #Douglas Berger #Separation Of Church And State #Amendment #Civil Rights #Freedom Of Religion #Atheism #Being Human #Nonbelief #Social Justice

Secular Left

Ohio's Don't Say Gay Bill Is Now Law And Professor Jerry Coyne FAFO

Secular Left

published πριν περίπου ένα χρόνο

Μοίρασέ το

MP3•Αρχική οθόνη επεισοδίου

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our Merch
Follow us on Bluesky
Find us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on Instagram
Find us on Counter Social
Find us on Mastadon

Κεφάλαια

1. Ohio's Don't Say Gay Bill Is Now Law And Professor Jerry Coyne FAFO (00:00:00)

2. Don't Say Gay in Ohio (00:01:00)

3. 1st Amendment Shouldn't Hurt People (00:17:37)

4. Jerry Coyne FAFO (00:28:13)

5. Trans Woman Appointed to City Council (00:37:09)

98 επεισόδια

#Politics #Religion #News Talk #News #Douglas Berger #Separation Of Church And State #Amendment #Civil Rights #Freedom Of Religion #Atheism #Being Human #Nonbelief #Social Justice

Όλα τα επεισόδια

Secular Left

1
Tyrant In A Top Hat: Radical Ideas for a Fractured Nation? 47:08

πριν 10 μέρες47:08

47:08

In this episode, we engage with Martin Armitage, co-author of the book "Tyrant in a Top Hat," which challenges the conventional narrative surrounding President Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War. We delve into thought-provoking questions: Did Lincoln ignite a civil war unnecessarily? Are the consequences of that conflict still reverberating through our society today? And could the United States benefit from a reevaluation, perhaps even division, based on differing cultural values? Armitage, bringing a rich background in history and political service, aims to encourage listeners to think critically about Lincoln's decision-making in 1861. His book seeks not to indoctrinate its readers with a particular viewpoint but rather to provoke discussion and self-reflection regarding historical interpretation and its implications for modern governance. We explore the historical context in which Lincoln operated, including the possibility that alternative measures could have been taken to address rising tensions rather than resorting to war. One of the compelling arguments in the book is the exploration of Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, a controversial move that prioritized national security over individual rights during a time of crisis. Armitage explains the significance of habeas corpus as a cornerstone of civil liberties, and we discuss whether Lincoln's actions set a troubling precedent for future governance. As our conversation evolves, we also touch upon Armitage's proposals for how modern-day America, which he describes as a "fractured nation," might navigate its profound ideological divides. He suggests the potential for regions within the U.S. to separate based on cultural lines, advocating for a new political structure that emphasizes local governance while maintaining overarching national protections for rights. While these ideas might seem radical, they stem from a desire to find practical solutions to contemporary issues of polarization and disenfranchisement. Throughout the episode, listeners are invited to engage with these challenging concepts and to reflect on what they mean for our understanding of modern democracy. At the end of the interview, Doug provides his own perspective, critiquing Armitage’s conclusions while acknowledging the value of his inquiries. Doug emphasizes the importance of spirited debate and the necessity for a strong central government dedicated to protecting universal rights for all citizens, expressing his belief that the fight for equality and civil liberties must continue unabated. Full Show Notes and Links Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
So, How is that protest vote over Gaza working out for you? 42:21

πριν 26 μέρες42:21

42:21

We explore the troubling narrative surrounding President Trump’s administration and its move to shut down USAID, a crucial foreign aid agency established by President Kennedy. We highlight how the dismantling of USAID can severely undermine America's relationships with democratic allies, turning foreign policy into a transactional affair where friendship is bargained rather than earned. We see how this aligns with the broader strategy laid out in Project 2025 – to eliminate foreign aid altogether, thereby creating a vacuum that could benefit adversaries like Russia and China. I also discuss the complexities of USAID's legacy, from humanitarian efforts to its controversial political ramifications, all in the context of a government that seems increasingly willing to sacrifice long-standing institutions in favor of short-term gains. We then shift to Ohio Attorney General David Yost, who has announced his run for governor, embodying a brand of conservative politics that is deeply entrenched in hypocrisy and moral failure. We examine Yost’s record, from his opposition to reproductive rights to his role in targeting marginalized individuals while neglecting corporate misconduct. His political motivations, rooted in Christian nationalism and a disdain for progressive values, raise serious questions about his leadership potential and the implications for Ohio's future. Finally, we discuss recent comments made by Trump regarding a proposed takeover of Gaza, exploring how such rhetoric reverberates through the Arab-American community and beyond. This segment connects to the consequence of political decisions leading to the rise and fall of candidate support, specifically focusing on the uncommitted movement within Michigan that emerged in response to dissatisfaction with Biden's policies and the fallout of their choices during the elections. The episode is a critical examination of how protest votes can inadvertently strengthen opponents, underscoring the need for strategic electoral engagement. Full Show Notes and Links Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Ohio's Don't Say Gay Bill Is Now Law And Professor Jerry Coyne FAFO 44:18

πριν 7 weeks44:18

44:18

Ohio’s recent legislative developments have sparked significant controversy. The state’s governor signed a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law, which not only limits discussions on LGBTQ+ topics in schools but also permits a Christian Nationalist group to remove children to bible study in the middle of the school day. Meanwhile, a federal judge ruled that using preferred pronouns constitutes a violation of the First Amendment, deepening the national debate on LGBTQ+ rights. Professor Jerry Coyne has come under fire for his use of biological arguments to justify discrimination, while in a positive turn, a Trans woman has been appointed to a city council, offering a glimmer of hope amid these challenges. These events reflect the growing cultural and legal tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues, free speech, and the role of religion in public education. We start with the contentious signing of a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law by Ohio’s governor, which has drawn sharp criticism for not only silencing conversations around sexual orientation in schools, especially for younger students, but also for enabling a Christian Nationalist group to indoctrinate public school children during school hours. The bill, now formalized under House Bill 8, imposes significant restrictions on discussing sexuality and mandates that educators inform parents of any changes in a student’s wellness services, particularly concerning their gender identity. The legislation aims to erase LGBTQ+ visibility while perpetuating a culture of fear and secrecy among students questioning their identities. A federal judge's recent decision, which declared that requiring teachers to use transgender students' preferred pronouns violates First Amendment rights, characterized such requirements as coercive. We emphasizes the chilling effect this ruling has on educators and students alike, reinforcing stigma and hostility against transgender individuals. We also critique the rationale used by the judge, criticizing the failure to recognize the basic dignity and rights of individuals as a cornerstone of this democracy. In a more hopeful turn, we celebrate a victory for representation as Arienne Childry , a trans woman, was appointed to the city council for St. Mary’s, Ohio. This appointment marks a significant milestone as it reflects the progress being made at local levels despite the oppressive legislative environment. We underscore the importance of having representatives who genuinely embody the values of inclusion and secular humanism within governmental structures, marking Childry's presence as a beacon of hope in a state riddled with anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment. Full Show Notes & Links Used Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Dad's Place Church: Zoning Disputes and the Fight for Religious Freedom 44:06

πριν 10 weeks44:06

44:06

We dive into the recent tumult surrounding two significant topics affecting public policy and religious freedom in Ohio. The spotlight is first placed on LifeWise Academy's attempts to ingratiate itself into Ohio public schools, alongside the ongoing case involving Dad's Place Church in Bryan, Ohio, as the Ohio Attorney General, David Yost, enters the fray. With rising tensions and opposing viewpoints, Doug dissects these developments, providing new insights into the legal and social landscape of the state. We get a comprehensive update on House Bill 8, a contentious piece of legislation that combines both anti-LGBT elements and provisions for Release Time Religious Instruction (RTRI). Doug reflects on the dynamics at play in the Ohio Senate's late-session debate, highlighting how amendments to the bill were pieced together amidst a growing coalition of concerned residents and advocacy groups opposed to the bill for one reason or another. Moving on to the case of Dad's Place Church, we contextualize the ongoing legal struggles faced by Pastor Chris Avell, who operates a makeshift homeless shelter in his church. A prior agreement between the city and Avell fell apart due to the pastor’s lack of adherence to necessary zoning regulations. The situation escalated as the city issued citations, resulting in a federal lawsuit propelled by the Christian nationalist legal organization First Liberty. We discuss how Yost's recent input in support of Avell raises critical questions about government interference in religious endeavors, especially in light of accusations that the city is selectively enforcing regulations against the church under the guise of public safety. We dissect Yost’s statements, questioning the narrative of animosity and exploitation that shapes the discourse around this case. Full Show Notes and Links Used Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Old Debates In A Murder's Wake And Ohio's Controversial Don't Say Gay Bill 39:18

πριν 12 weeks39:18

39:18

The recent murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare, unearthed lingering debates about health care reform from back during President Obama's administration. The murder, occurring outside a high-profile hotel in New York City, ignites discussions about the frustrations directed at health insurance corporations, reminiscent of grievances voiced during the 2009 health care debates. We reflect on how the tragic event serves as a grim backdrop to the ongoing conversation about making health care universally accessible and the long-overlooked promise of a public option. We examine the discontent over how progressives were misled into believing that the ACA could be the first step toward more comprehensive reform, which has yet to materialize more than a decade later. The lack of subsequent development towards a public option or Medicare-for-all only deepens the disenchantment among many supporters of health care reform, echoing similar frustrations that arose during the passage of the ACA. We then shift to a significant legislative issue in Ohio: the proposed House Bill 8, which mirrors the contentious “Don’t Say Gay” laws previously enacted in Florida. This bill threatens the existing protections for LGBTQ+ students, requiring educators to disclose a student's questioning of their identity to their parents, regardless of the potential risks involved. We articulate my concerns regarding the bill's impacts on both secular education and the welfare of vulnerable students, who could face dangerous repercussions from such mandatory disclosures. We scrutinize the underhanded political maneuvers involved in the Ohio legislature that aim to push this bill through under the guise of parental rights while ignoring the necessary considerations for the well-being of children in precarious home environments. By equating education with indoctrination, the proponents of House Bill 8 jeopardize crucial inclusivity and awareness in public schools, which are designed to expand children's horizons beyond their immediate experiences. The strategies employed by proponents of Ohio House Bill 8 reveal the extent to which political agendas can distort education and silence essential dialogues around diversity and inclusion. As we navigate this landscape, it becomes evident that the fight for equitable health care and just policies for all students is far from over, requiring vigilant advocacy from citizens and allies in the progressive movement. Full Show Notes and Links Used Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Indoctrination or Education? The Controversial Push for Religious Programs in Public-Schools 34:50

πριν 14 weeks34:50

34:50

In this episode, we delve into the current legislative climate in Ohio as the state legislature rushes through a series of controversial bills during the lame duck session. The urgency to pass these bills stems from the impending expiration of the General Assembly at the end of December, compelling lawmakers to push through legislation that aligns with their agendas. One such bill is an alarming proposal would force public-schools to allow LifeWise Academy, an evangelical organization, to conduct religious instruction during school hours, undermining the secular nature of public education. The bills — House Bill 445 and Senate Bill 293 — would mandate public school districts to adopt a release time religious instruction policy, facilitating LifeWise's access to students for indoctrination under the guise of education. We emphasize the inconsistencies in the motivations of those advocating for such legislation, noting the hypocrisy of their concerns about indoctrination when it comes to secular subjects like critical race theory, while simultaneously promoting religious teachings in public schools. The episode features insights from bill hearings earlier this month, where key figures, including LifeWise founder Joel Penton, faced scrutiny over the lack of guidelines for their proposed programs. In a particular clip, Penton struggles to understand why there is growing opposition to LifeWise's encroachment into public education, attributing it to their increasing popularity rather than genuine concerns about the integrity of educational institutions and the rights of parents and children. Throughout the episode, we juxtapose comments made by LifeWise representatives with those of concerned parents and activists, such as Keith Comer, drawing attention to a disturbing trend where religious entities are increasingly seeking to integrate their agendas into public education under the cover of community service. Interestingly, the conversation shifts to how these legislative machinations are not just about religious freedom, but about securing a foothold for a particular ideology within our educational framework. Finally, we reflect on the implications of these policies if enacted, questioning whether public schools should be used as platforms for religious indoctrination under any circumstance. This episode serves not only as a critique of specific bills but as an urgent appeal for vigilance in protecting educational integrity from sectarian influences. Full show notes and links used Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Democrats Post-Election Loss Freak Out 31:09

πριν 16 weeks31:09

31:09

We take a deep dive into the recent election and its ramifications, focusing particularly on the Democrats' surprising loss and the implications for future campaigns. We look at both the evident and subtle factors that contributed to this outcome. Being a black woman was a significant hurdle for Vice President Kamala Harris, which I argue led to a disheartening decline in support from key demographics, particularly among white women. We reflect on the expansive backing Harris had throughout her campaign—endorsements from high-profile figures, a massive fundraising effort, and relentless campaigning in critical swing states. Despite these advantages, we dissect several conventional narratives that emerged post-election, including claims about "wokeness" hurting her candidacy. These perspectives fail to recognize the historical biases that women, and especially women of color, face in political arenas. The correlation between Harris's identity and the voting decisions by constituents shines a light on the entrenched prejudices in the electorate. The the role of the media can't be overlooked in shaping public perception and the electoral outcome. We draw stark contrasts between how the media covered the candidacy of Trump versus Harris. The disparity in coverage serves as a significant barrier to the Democrats' message and outreach. Right-wing media not only sets the news agenda but also propagates narratives that undermine Democratic candidates. We highlight the absurdity of critiques directed at Democratic strategies, especially in the face of a system that fundamentally prioritizes white male leadership and often disregards the complexities of intersectionality in politics. There is a vital requirement for a counterbalance to the dominant right-wing platforms that distort narratives for political gain. If the Democrats are to regain ground, establishing robust media channels to promote liberal perspectives and to advocate for equitable policies is paramount. Full Show Notes and Links Used Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Secular Voices in Politics: Sarah Levin on Representation and Change 1:03:38

πριν 18 weeks1:03:38

1:03:38

We speak with secular political activist Sarah Levin about the evolving landscape for secular voters within the Democratic Party, the implications of interfaith coalitions, and the role of non-religious constituents in upcoming elections. We also explore Sarah's substantial activism, including her role as founder of Secular Strategies and her efforts to establish secular representation within the Democratic National Committee (DNC). She emphasizes the significant strides made since her last appearance, particularly the inclusion of non-religious voices in the DNC’s interfaith efforts and the official endorsement of the principle of separation of church and state in the party's platform for the first time. Doug and Sarah also discuss the challenges that still exist, including the perception issues surrounding secular candidates among both voters and the party apparatus. Sarah reflects on the importance of building a political identity that resonates with both non-religious voters and religious individuals, stressing the necessity of intersectionality in politics. We also focus on voter engagement and the upcoming elections. A critical segment of the conversation addresses the complex U.S. relationship with Israel amidst the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Sarah articulates her belief that while the U.S. has historically provided unquestioned support to Israel, this is a moment for reevaluation—especially in light of the potential ramifications of a Trump administration, which promises more extreme measures than current policies. Finally we encourage listeners to actively participate in the political process, follow updates on secular candidates, and engage in conversations that amplify the non-religious voice. With Sarah Levin's groundwork laying the foundation for future progress, this episode serves as a clarion call to recognize both the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for secular individuals in politics. Full Show Notes & Links Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Truth Is Scarce During Campaign Season 43:48

πριν 21 weeks43:48

43:48

We look into the murky waters of political dishonesty prevalent during the current election cycle, particularly focusing on the blatant lies propagated in political advertisements. With election day swiftly approaching, it’s easy to lose sight of the facts amidst the barrage of misleading ads from large PACs like the Congressional Leadership Fund and American Prosperity Fund. Unlike other forms of advertising that are subject to regulatory scrutiny, political ads enjoy the protections of the First Amendment, allowing candidates to misrepresent facts without penalty. Then we look at the recent vice presidential debate, which we approach with skepticism, arguing that these events are mere vehicles for candidates to produce soundbites for future commercials rather than genuine discussions of policy. C.F. Vance’s performance is scrutinized, particularly his fabrications regarding Trump’s stance on Obamacare. The focus shifts to Trump’s ongoing legal battles, highlighting the critical distinction made by prosecutor Jack Smith about what constitutes official actions versus private actions in the context of election interference. It’s crucial for voters to grasp that the president's attempts to influence the election were not part of his official duties—a point we argue could play a significant role in the upcoming election. Next we grapple with the aftermath of a devastating hurricane that recently struck Florida and made its way through the southeast. The political ramifications of disaster recovery aid, particularly the outrage from conservatives about federal assistance, are examined. We clarify the purpose of the $750 immediate assistance offered by FEMA, juxtaposing it against the broader and more complex recovery efforts needing more time to be processed. This sense of urgency is contrasted with the indifference displayed by congressional leaders who postpone aid packages for political gain. Lastly, we celebrate a recent victory for school districts standing up against LifeWise Academy — an evangelical initiative that seeks to impose religious instruction during the school day, rather than as an extracurricular activity. We break down the controversy surrounding a school board in Westerville, Ohio, which voted to rescind its policy that allowed LifeWise to operate during school hours. This decision was driven not only by concerns over curriculum disruption and liability but also by broader implications about maintaining the secular integrity of public education. LifeWise’s attempts to portray itself as a victim of circumstance and its extensive funding sources underscore the lengths to which such organizations will go to infiltrate public schools. Full Show Notes plus Links Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
The Trump GOP and The Crutch of Divisive Immigration Tactics 38:13

πριν 23 weeks38:13

38:13

We look at the alarming trend of Republican rhetoric surrounding immigration, particularly their attempts to vilify Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio. Drawing comparisons to the divisive strategies of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, we explore how the GOP is leveraging fear and misinformation to distract voters from their lack of substantial policy proposals. During the debate, Trump absurdly suggested that immigrants in Springfield were resorting to eating pets—a claim that sparked ridicule from Vice President Kamala Harris and has since been debunked by local authorities and independent fact-checkers. The persistence of such lies indicates a broader strategy by Republicans to unite their base through fear-mongering and scapegoating marginalized communities. With no concrete plans for critical issues like healthcare or the economy, the GOP resorts to these gimmicks to rally support. Republican Vivek Ramaswamy hosted a town hall event, where local residents expressed concerns about the integration of immigrants. Notably absent from this discussion were representatives from the Haitian community, which raises questions about the inclusivity of the dialogue surrounding immigration. While Ramaswamy blamed the role of federal policies in the situation, much of the conversation was steeped in fear and blame directed at the newcomers rather than seeking solutions collaboratively. We then expose the hollow messages underpinning the campaign of Derek Merrin, a Republican candidate for Ohio’s 9th Congressional District. Marrin focuses on immigration as a key issue while neglecting to address pressing concerns like economic development and resources for existing residents. His vague promises of returning high-paying jobs to the area are juxtaposed against a history of Republican governance that has failed to deliver tangible results. The current immigration discourse often overlooks the positive contributions of immigrants, focusing instead on exaggerated fears. This conversation serves as a reminder of the importance of dialogue grounded in facts and compassion rather than fear and misinformation. Full Show Notes Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
GOP Immigration Fear-mongering and Defending Secular Public Education 37:41

πριν 25 weeks37:41

37:41

We investigate the political tactics of the Republican Party as we approach the election season, highlighting their reliance on divisive rhetoric around immigration rather than substantive policy proposals. With a convicted felon leading the party, it's become apparent that their strategy is to invoke fear rather than offer solutions. We examine how they've resurrected the illegal immigrant narrative to scare voters, particularly targeting older white demographics and the more gullible segments of their base. We debunk the myths surrounding undocumented immigrants voting, emphasizing the legal complexities and safeguarding mechanisms in place that prevent such occurrences. Transitioning to a critical toolkit developed to counter the rise of Christian nationalism in public education, we share insights from Doug's involvement with the Honesty for Ohio Education advocacy group. This toolkit serves as a comprehensive guide for parents, educators, and community members looking to navigate the treacherous waters of Release Time Religious Instruction (RTRI) policies, which allow students to leave school for religious instruction during the day. We explain the manipulative strategies deployed by groups like Lifewise Academy, which disguises its religious agenda under a veneer of character-based education, while the reality is an aggressive attempt to convert schoolchildren to Christianity. A major component of the tool-kit is a critical review of the data backing Lifewise Academy’s claims of positive outcomes for students participating in their program. By exposing the statistical manipulation and selective reporting methodologies, we argue that such claims are more about marketing than genuine educational benefits. Good education should prioritize the well-being and development of the student, free from religious indoctrination. Full show notes Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
People Are Looking For Accountability In 2024 42:32

πριν 28 weeks42:32

42:32

We Don't Want Empty Promises, Party Manipulations, Or Politcal Bridge Burning We look into the ongoing political landscape in Ohio, dissecting the implications of a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at curbing gerrymandering that could potentially end the Republican supermajority in the state. The Ohio Ballot Board's recent attempt to manipulate the ballot summary for this measure raises serious concerns about transparency and fairness. We examine the political maneuvering behind this effort and discuss how it fits into the larger narrative of electoral integrity. We reflect on Senator Chuck Schumer's remarks to reporters during the 2024 Democratic National Convention. Schumer's bold assertion that voting Democrat in November will lead to significant changes in the filibuster deserves scrutiny. We explore the skepticism that surrounds these promises, given past experiences where similar assertions did not materialize into action once the Democrats had power. The question remains: can we trust the Democratic leadership to follow through on commitments that can reshape legislative processes critical to our democracy? Then we unpack the disappointing political ad from Rep. Marcy Kaptur, a longtime House Democrat facing re-election. The ad's attempt to appeal to conservative constituents while alienating progressives highlights a troubling trend within the party. Kaptur's rhetorical decisions, particularly her invocation of "the far left," indicate a strategy that sacrifices progressive values in a bid for political survival. We analyze the implications of such messaging and question whether it will succeed in winning over voters who are fundamentally opposed to her party's principles. Throughout the episode, we engage with the underlying themes of accountability, representation, and the challenges facing candidates in a polarized political environment. As Ohioans prepare for a pivotal election, the conversations surrounding these issues become increasingly crucial. How can we encourage a more inclusive political discourse that genuinely represents the diversity of opinions and needs within our communities? Full Show Notes Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Very Good Reasons Why You Should Vote For Trump 31:06

πριν 31 weeks31:06

31:06

In this spicy episode, we give you many reasons why voting for Donald Trump in the upcoming election is not a wise choice. We look into the history of the 2024 presidential election, highlighting the lack of merit in considering Trump as a viable candidate due to his questionable character and numerous controversies during his previous presidency. We call out the absurdity in Trump's behavior, highlighting his divisive rhetoric and lack of concern for the well-being of the American people. We look at the potential implications of a Trump presidency, drawing parallels to historical events and emphasizing the dangers of embracing divisive ideologies. We urge listeners to critically analyze the information presented to them, especially in the age of social media where misinformation can easily spread. Additionally, we touch on the importance of understanding the motives behind political posts and the responsibility of individuals to engage in meaningful conversations based on facts and context. We then highlight the potential scenarios surrounding the upcoming election, expressing concerns about possible election interference and the need for vigilance in protecting democracy. We emphasize the importance of making informed choices and not falling prey to divisive tactics or fear-mongering strategies employed by certain political factions. Consider the long-term implications of your voting decisions and prioritize the well-being of the country and future generations by making informed and thoughtful choices at the ballot box. Full Show Notes Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Lifewise Academy Exposed: The Dangerous Intersection of Religion and Public Schools with Zach Parrish and Molly Gaines 1:11:55

πριν 34 weeks1:11:55

1:11:55

In this jammed packed episode, we talk with Zach and Molly, parents who are taking a stand against LifeWise Academy, an evangelical Christian nationalist group that has found a way to seep into public schools through a legal loophole. They have formed Parents Against LifeWise to shed light on the group's questionable tactics, lack of background checks on members, and the concerning activities they are engaged in. The episode paints a grim picture of how school districts are turning a blind eye to the situation, emphasizing the urgent need for public awareness and action to combat the influence of such groups in educational settings. We touch on the frustrating moments of silence encountered when reaching out to organizations like FFRF and Ohio ACLU, who have failed to address the issues at hand adequately. This inaction leaves children vulnerable and without proper representation, highlighting the crucial role parents play in advocating for their rights. The responsibility falls on schools to ensure they are held accountable for any violations, rather than letting external groups like LifeWise escape blame for any harmful activities. The discussion exposes the deceptive nature of LifeWise, presenting itself as non-denominational while promoting exclusive evangelical beliefs, potentially preying on susceptible communities. Their curriculum, based on the Southern Baptist Convention, spreads harmful ideologies among impressionable young minds, as evidenced by documents detailing their damaging teachings. The podcast also shines a light on individuals like Joel Penton, involved in the group's questionable practices under the guise of motivational speeches with underlying religious agendas. The dubious funding sources and misleading petition strategies employed by LifeWise raise significant concerns about their true motives. We finally explore the legal challenges faced by Zach, who shared LifeWise's curriculum online and is now embroiled in a lawsuit with the group. Despite accessing the material lawfully and with no profit motive, Zach finds himself in a legal battle against LifeWise, showcasing the community rallying behind him for support. We touch on a recent scandal involving a former LifeWise employee, adding layers of complexity to the situation. Zach expresses gratitude for the solidarity received and discusses avenues for assistance in his legal defense as the podcast concludes with well-wishes for his upcoming court proceedings, directing listeners to their website for further information and updates. Full Show Notes Send us a text Support the show Subscribe to our free newsletter Check out our Merch Follow us on Bluesky Find us on Twitter (for now) Find us on Instagram Find us on Counter Social Find us on Mastadon…

Secular Left

1
Christian Nationalism in Legislation: Facts vs. Fear 48:16

πριν 36 weeks48:16