#58 – Neely on Augmented Reality, Ethics and Property Rights

Algocracy and Transhumanism Podcast

Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το John Danaher. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον John Danaher ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.

5+ y ago

MP3•Αρχική οθόνη επεισοδίου

erica neely

In this episode I talk to Erica Neely. Erica is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Ohio Northern University specializing in philosophy of technology and computer ethics. Her work focuses is on the ethical ramifications of emerging technologies. She has written a number of papers on 3D printing, the ethics of video games, robotics and augmented reality. We chat about the ethics of augmented reality, with a particular focus on property rights and the problems that arise when we blend virtual and physical reality together in augmented reality platforms.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher and a variety of other services (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

0:00 – Introduction
1:00 – What is augmented reality (AR)?
5:55 – Is augmented reality overhyped?
10:36 – What are property rights?
14:22 – Justice and autonomy in the protection of property rights
16:47 – Are we comfortable with property rights over virtual spaces/objects?
22:30 – The blending problem: why augmented reality poses a unique problem for the protection of property rights
27:00 – The different modalities of augmented reality: single-sphere or multi-sphere?
30:45 – Scenario 1: Single-sphere AR with private property
34:28 – Scenario 2: Multi-sphere AR with private property
37:30 – Other ethical problems in scenario 2
43:25 – Augmented reality vs imagination
47:15 – Public property as contested space
49:38 – Scenario 3: Multi-sphere AR with public property
54:30 – Scenario 4: Single-sphere AR with public property
1:00:28 – Must the owner of the single-sphere AR platform be regulated as a public utility/entity?
1:02:25 – Other important ethical issues that arise from the use of AR

Relevant Links

Erica’s Homepage
‘Augmented Reality, Augmented Ethics: Who Has the Right to Augment a Particular Physical Space?‘ by Erica
‘The Ethics of Choice in Single Player Video Games‘ by Erica
‘The Risks of Revolution: Ethical Dilemmas in 3D Printing from a US Perspective‘ by Erica
‘Machines and the Moral Community‘ by Erica
IKEA Place augmented reality app
L’Oreal’s use of augmented reality make-up apps
Holocaust Museum Bans Pokemon Go

64 επεισόδια

#Algocracy #Transhumanism #Politics #John Danaher #Philosophy #Society #Podcasting Education #Algorithms #Government