Patent Bar MPEP Q & A podcast

Artwork

Questions And Answers Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 Lisa Parmley USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 Law News Politics Business Business Disciplines Podcasting Education

Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Μοίρασέ το

Αρχική οθόνη σειράς•Feed

Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.

Patent Bar Review

… continue reading

310 επεισόδια

#Questions And Answers #Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Lisa Parmley #USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Law #News #Politics #Business #Business Disciplines #Podcasting Education

Artwork

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

44 subscribers

updated πριν 8 μέρες

Μοίρασέ το

Αρχική οθόνη σειράς•Feed

Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.

Patent Bar Review

… continue reading

310 επεισόδια

#Questions And Answers #Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Lisa Parmley #USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Law #News #Politics #Business #Business Disciplines #Podcasting Education

Όλα τα επεισόδια

×

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. 2:53

πριν 8 μέρες2:53

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

2:53

Question: List two pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. Answer: Each protest should be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER 37 CFR 1.291.” It is also important that any protest against a pending application specifically identify the application to which the protest is directed with the identification being […] The post MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. 3:01

πριν 22 μέρες3:01

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:01

Question: Name at least two items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: (1) a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text […] The post MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? 3:19

πριν 5 weeks3:19

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:19

Question: Where a restriction (including an election of species) requirement was made in an application and applicant permitted the elected invention to issue as a patent without filing a divisional application on the non-elected invention(s) or on non-claimed subject matter distinct from the elected invention, can the non-elected invention(s) and non-claimed, distinct subject matter be […] The post MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? 2:26

πριν 7 weeks2:26

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

2:26

Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entry will be via […] The post MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? 3:41

πριν 9 weeks3:41

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:41

Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the […] The post MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? 2:22

πριν 11 weeks2:22

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

2:22

Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] The post MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? 2:11

πριν 13 weeks2:11

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

2:11

Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee by a credit card, is […] The post MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. 2:39

πριν 15 weeks2:39

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

2:39

Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? 3:02

πριν 17 weeks3:02

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:02

Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specification and enabled by the original […] The post MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? 3:52

πριν 19 weeks3:52

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:52

Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may become necessary to […] The post MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. 3:11

πριν 21 weeks3:11

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:11

Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” […] The post MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? 3:30

πριν 23 weeks3:30

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:30

Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, the […] The post MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. 2:19

πριν 25 weeks2:19

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

2:19

Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. 3:18

πριν 27 weeks3:18

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:18

Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second petition […] The post MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Artwork

1
MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) 3:23

πριν 29 weeks3:23

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

Αναπαραγωγή αργότερα

3:23

Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […] The post MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Καλώς ήλθατε στο Player FM!

Το FM Player σαρώνει τον ιστό για podcasts υψηλής ποιότητας για να απολαύσετε αυτή τη στιγμή. Είναι η καλύτερη εφαρμογή podcast και λειτουργεί σε Android, iPhone και στον ιστό. Εγγραφή για συγχρονισμό συνδρομών σε όλες τις συσκευές.

Ακούστε 500 + θέματα

Οδηγός γρήγορης αναφοράς

Κορυφαία podcast

Marketing Podcasts από το σύμβουλο μάρκετινγκ Θέμη Σαρανταένα

ΜΑΡΜΕΛΑΔΑ ΦΡΑΟΥΛΑ

Όσα ξέρει η Μαρία με τη Μαρία Σολωμού

POP για τις Δύσκολες Ώρες

Sugarenia and Stelabouras make a podcast (#ssmap)

Πρωταγωνιστές με τον Σταύρο Θεοδωράκη

Τροφή Για Σκέψη

CyberSpectrum (ex Feta Report)

Ακούστε αυτήν την εκπομπή ενώ εξερευνάτε

Αναπαραγωγή