Artwork

Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το mindcrimelibertyshow. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον mindcrimelibertyshow ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Εφαρμογή podcast
Πηγαίνετε εκτός σύνδεσης με την εφαρμογή Player FM !

Ep 103: Who owns the land: Marx, Hoppe or Crazy Horse?

47:27
 
Μοίρασέ το
 

Manage episode 337772781 series 2732479
Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το mindcrimelibertyshow. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον mindcrimelibertyshow ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.

The Mindcrime Liberty Show discusses who owns the land by using three figures to represent differing positions: Karl Marx, Hans Hoppe and Crazy Horse. We argue that there is much overlap between the Marxists and Hoppean position as opposed to the Crazy Horse position. If in order to own land one must mix one's labor with it, then there is no way that Crazy Horse, or any nomadic group, could own all the land. Marxists themselves, as much as they ridicule libertarian property theory, have a kind of ownership theory themselves which has more affinities than commonly thought as Hans Hoppe demonstrates in his lecture what Marx gets right.
If laborers are entitled to the full value of their labor, as well as the means of production which in this case includes the land, then there is no room for absentee landlords. The Marxists analysis arguably leads to the politically incorrect conclusion that the hunter gatherer natives are absentee landlords engaged in hoarding and monopolizing large swaths of valuable land which isn’t theirs. This is especially true if Left Libertarians want to advocate open borders in the current existing society on the grounds that there is open land considering that in the past more “open” land was available. Even if the natives could demonstrate they own the land, which for much of it would be rather difficult, the current existing landowners tend to be the best land users. The conflict between a more technologically advanced society and a nomadic one is a conflict which arguably the Marxists are on the side of Columbus, Custer and numerous others. Karl Marx praises the breakdown of rural idiocy which in this case could well include the natives. University of Washington Professor Stuart Reges was arguably channelling Marx when he said “[the] Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington”.

  continue reading

122 επεισόδια

Artwork
iconΜοίρασέ το
 
Manage episode 337772781 series 2732479
Το περιεχόμενο παρέχεται από το mindcrimelibertyshow. Όλο το περιεχόμενο podcast, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των επεισοδίων, των γραφικών και των περιγραφών podcast, μεταφορτώνεται και παρέχεται απευθείας από τον mindcrimelibertyshow ή τον συνεργάτη της πλατφόρμας podcast. Εάν πιστεύετε ότι κάποιος χρησιμοποιεί το έργο σας που προστατεύεται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα χωρίς την άδειά σας, μπορείτε να ακολουθήσετε τη διαδικασία που περιγράφεται εδώ https://el.player.fm/legal.

The Mindcrime Liberty Show discusses who owns the land by using three figures to represent differing positions: Karl Marx, Hans Hoppe and Crazy Horse. We argue that there is much overlap between the Marxists and Hoppean position as opposed to the Crazy Horse position. If in order to own land one must mix one's labor with it, then there is no way that Crazy Horse, or any nomadic group, could own all the land. Marxists themselves, as much as they ridicule libertarian property theory, have a kind of ownership theory themselves which has more affinities than commonly thought as Hans Hoppe demonstrates in his lecture what Marx gets right.
If laborers are entitled to the full value of their labor, as well as the means of production which in this case includes the land, then there is no room for absentee landlords. The Marxists analysis arguably leads to the politically incorrect conclusion that the hunter gatherer natives are absentee landlords engaged in hoarding and monopolizing large swaths of valuable land which isn’t theirs. This is especially true if Left Libertarians want to advocate open borders in the current existing society on the grounds that there is open land considering that in the past more “open” land was available. Even if the natives could demonstrate they own the land, which for much of it would be rather difficult, the current existing landowners tend to be the best land users. The conflict between a more technologically advanced society and a nomadic one is a conflict which arguably the Marxists are on the side of Columbus, Custer and numerous others. Karl Marx praises the breakdown of rural idiocy which in this case could well include the natives. University of Washington Professor Stuart Reges was arguably channelling Marx when he said “[the] Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington”.

  continue reading

122 επεισόδια

Όλα τα επεισόδια

×
 
Loading …

Καλώς ήλθατε στο Player FM!

Το FM Player σαρώνει τον ιστό για podcasts υψηλής ποιότητας για να απολαύσετε αυτή τη στιγμή. Είναι η καλύτερη εφαρμογή podcast και λειτουργεί σε Android, iPhone και στον ιστό. Εγγραφή για συγχρονισμό συνδρομών σε όλες τις συσκευές.

 

Οδηγός γρήγορης αναφοράς